From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 12:05:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBAA1065670; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20808FC0A; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:14f9:cfdf:caf2:2c18]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 440284AC31; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:04:34 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:04:29 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1903660247.20110909160429@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd In-Reply-To: References: <663133681.20110907193747@serebryakov.spb.ru> <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> <426917282.20110908125907@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4610390305.20110908154130@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1705262661.20110908180850@serebryakov.spb.ru> <458771414.20110908183656@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4910491962.20110908185213@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1273865639.20110908191303@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1607911768.20110909113824@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1853154884.20110909145338@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AP performance (again): txpower regulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:05:06 -0000 Hello, Adrian. You wrote 9 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 15:06:03: > Right, but this is where you now do some more digging. :) Ok, I have friend of mine with his not-so-old notebook here. It could do 802.11a, channels 36-64 and 149-165. It works worse than 802.11g. Signal strength is lower when two notebooks are side-by-side and bandwidth is almost the same or lower. This firend's notebook shows exactly the same performance for 802.11g as mine, so, I think, they have comparable cards and antennas inside. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov