From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 29 09:39:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD148AB8F3E for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8453E1DAD for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z135so181265908iof.0 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:39:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=6enLipvvzNyRk2TyA0+n5458DWOFPtfKLB4cZNY1yqw=; b=jVznPIZ2naLbAGkegcZICF2EjhYfKV+UDA5a0WDSugmUfWBA5T1t37XWWG5FYhW6ev AMS4ISV0IyuWHIUWXqpaeit0zJSIk1FsyaWu/p6Cip6BMPuhXC5dlUS0berfixPzB2pR bCKASD4h+cDgpQBurxBYzq39hI4eULGB9ZeO8GEznEDVG1U4FZ9dXIniKlHemGgAlRaw tf/c8Np5brIn++aseNmqBe/eVg1yJ1OxCGHH96wRkW6AMjxJ35RgD8HpCUyZNiTgwgRP msUnsFqe6An2e8peZBYNCwhDynAD9+/bpnMIpeJM7vdYRc2o0CUnM86cD6PZrqGrNGZo nXOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=6enLipvvzNyRk2TyA0+n5458DWOFPtfKLB4cZNY1yqw=; b=EVSU/i+73WdEyhRC8L4XyBf7EKT/V4xGngGjcsTgGe05F7izgRQNwv8Yyn+lDUCRU5 lTbut6XNzT0LsLuigEIvZr5JYhrCzwVaNeBO0Ck87yzqSRE2w29RXp4yAlrLiliM19Yn mcZbV6YhyqupuRmt/H6Rs33WBaMGhlXRJj+0bJFhqka+elca195fRTD9pI7PjrfcDR1m 9L1cklDpiCYmvhGpEq/SQ9LkwUhur7P8Vtyj6EbbbQ7FXbrucstqA59a6aoj6oWiWy29 jClF4eiuwyUX9pjOVInMA/p1suOTyEvgR+RxSrQe9UgoK2L/PYRSv80zXD6kw57GYRb0 yGYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQoo1Armug9xzYfmJTXoGCDciuGrJEs9DoC5/URmez1m6tlboi6O6YEvYwqmLNM3Aj/jRBRQ0A5RvNDZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.31.9 with SMTP id f9mr19311547iof.18.1456738796959; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.206.3 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.206.3 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:39:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:39:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= To: Chris Inacio Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:39:57 -0000 El 28 feb. 2016 8:11 p. m., "Chris Inacio" escribi=C3= =B3: > > Hello all, > > I was considering adding some more support into some tooling/ports for > FreeBSD and I thought it would probably be good to get configuration > management support some thought. So I can understand under certain Linux > flavors (e.g. RedHat) that puppet is the de facto choice - since the > distribution packager has chosen one. > > Is there a dominant one for FreeBSD? > > Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use. If you want > to add more to the conversation, that's fine. I understand the mailing > list I posted this to and the likely audience - as I said I started think > about this from adding more support into some ports. > > Thanks > chris inacio > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ansible?