From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 21 20:42:17 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id UAA29281 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:42:17 -0700 Received: from fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.171]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA29275 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:42:14 -0700 Received: by fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA26461; Tue, 22 Aug 95 03:40:49 GMT Received: by emu.fsl.noaa.gov (1.38.193.4/SMI-4.1 (1.38.193.4)) id AA16401; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 21:40:38 -0600 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 21:40:38 -0600 From: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) Message-Id: <9508220340.AA16401@emu.fsl.noaa.gov> To: imp@village.org Cc: peter@bonkers.taronga.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199508220324.VAA08377@rover.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Mon, 21 Aug 1995 21:24:33 -0600) Subject: Re: Any reason we can't enable the bus mouse by default? Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Warner" == Warner Losh writes: Warner> Tk is much easier and simpler than Xm or Xt, which Warner> probably explains its popularity. My big beef with Tk is Warner> that it has never been extremely Motif compliant (close, Warner> yes, but not compliant in a multitude of details). Well, Tk 4.0 is much more Motifish than any of its predecessors. But I don't consider Motif compliance a worthwhile metric anyway (I hate Motif). But I do admit that Tk's Motif-like widgets somehow look, operate, and feel better than Motif itself. Then again, I like the way OI's Motif ``feels'' as well, for what it's worth. -- Sean Kelly NOAA Forecast Systems Lab, Boulder Colorado USA To me, clowns aren't funny. In fact, they're kind of scary. I've wondered where this started, and I think it goes back to the time I went to the circus, and a clown killed my dad. -- Jack Handey