From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug  9 08:11:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA18632
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 08:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA18615
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 08:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608091511.IAA18615@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA115313465; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 01:11:05 +1000
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: List of OpenBSD changes
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 01:11:05 +1000 (EST)
Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, ollivier.robert@eurocontrol.fr,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <8977.839603302@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Aug 9, 96 08:08:22 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Jordan K. Hubbard, sie said:
> 
> > Because of the people (I can assume this is the only reason :) behind
> > OpenBSD, it would seem that whilst both NetBSD & FreeBSD people are
> > concerned about adding things from other's trees, OpenBSD doesn't and
> 
> I've never been aware of any particular degree of concern regarding
> the importation of NetBSD changes into FreeBSD (sometimes the changes
> themselves were a matter for concern, but that had nothing to do with
> their origin).

Hmmm, maybe I'm confusing that with the difficulty implied by the diverging
(internal) kernel interfaces and other such differences.