From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 10:00:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1938116A46B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FAA13C44B for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l53A0EaB058631 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l53A0Ekb058629; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 10:00:14 GMT Message-Id: <200706031000.l53A0Ekb058629@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: keve@Safe-mail.net Cc: Subject: Re: bin/95550: [patch] ntpd(8): NTPD/ntpdate complain about IPv6 interface not f X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: keve@Safe-mail.net List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:00:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/95550; it has been noted by GNATS. From: keve@Safe-mail.net To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, sunyuxi@yahoo.com Cc: Subject: Re: bin/95550: [patch] ntpd(8): NTPD/ntpdate complain about IPv6 interface not f Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:47:58 -0400 I re-discovered this issue this week on FreeBSD/i386 6.2-RELEASE-p4. Before submitting a new PR my search found that this problem has been reported already multiple times. PRs bin/78728 and bin/95550 appear to be duplicates of each other. It has been over a year now and even though the solution patches were provided and the fix can already be found in NetBSD code, no improvement was done here. This is a shame! I see no point in filing another PR. Could somebody please give this a kick!