Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 May 1997 01:22:09 +0400 (MSD)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen sleep.c 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970518011409.610C-100000@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <199705171203.UAA22306@spinner.DIALix.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 May 1997, Peter Wemm wrote:

> Are you sure that this is sleep() related?  I have not been able 
> to reproduce this here [yet]...

Yes, I am 100% shure. I have 6000 requests per day WWW site on -current to
test this. Child dies and broken pages stops immediately after sleep
replaced with old variant and begins again immediately when nanosleep
used. I'll try to dig out more. If I don't find anything more, I can give
you access to my -current site to allow you to see and test it. 

> Do you have rfc1413 (ident) lookups turned on?  There is some highly 
> suspicious handling of SIGALRM in there..  In fact, it returns with it's 
> own SIGALRM handler active still..  This is definately a bug!!

Of course not.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970518011409.610C-100000>