From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 19 19:29:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA13342 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 19:29:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp7261.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA13288 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 02:29:03 GMT (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by ppp1563.on.bellglobal.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA00346; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 21:31:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ppp1563.on.bellglobal.com: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 21:31:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: Matthew Hunt cc: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/5605 In-Reply-To: <199804170640.XAA11789@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Matthew Hunt wrote: > Tim Vanderhoek suggested that the ports committers could use the > input of reviewers. A bout of insomnia has prodded me to review. To be fair, I think it was someone else's suggestion (can't remember whose), although I picked-up on it in a more serious fashion. [good changes elided] -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message