Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:50:44 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler? Message-ID: <CAN6yY1tVatGqvLKnCj9nFYN03kYPmrUfjxV7R96TWd6-RL-Mbw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ae480e24-4510-f203-4071-e05e481e6d48@rawbw.com> References: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com> <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu> <ae480e24-4510-f203-4071-e05e481e6d48@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: > On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> >There are two questions: >>> >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? >>> >> Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? >> > > > It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, because c++11 or c++14 isn't > (fully) supported there. > Now these fallout messages will keep coming and nothing can be done to fix > them. > > Yuri As you state, it is broken in 10.1 and that is likely not fixable, so add a BROKEN statement for 10.1 and that should stop attempts to build for 10.1. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1tVatGqvLKnCj9nFYN03kYPmrUfjxV7R96TWd6-RL-Mbw>