From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mon Dec 14 19:22:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E4A4C1452 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cvrrd3GDdz3jW4; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pool-100-8-53-238.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [100.8.53.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jkim/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56D17252BA; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl To: Ed Maste , "Wall, Stephen" Cc: Bob Bishop , "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" References: From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <9febc23e-2db0-add2-f31b-1356909331dd@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:22:56 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:22:57 -0000 On 20. 12. 14., Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 11:46, Ed Maste wrote: >> >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen wrote: >>> >>>> A query: am I right that the patch doesn’t bump the OpenSSL version to 1.1.1.i ? >>> >>> That is correct. >> >> Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i includes some additional, minor >> changes beyond the vulnerability fix. 1.1.1i is now in HEAD (as of >> r368472) and has been merged to stable/12. > > Oops, I got ahead of myself - it has not yet been merged to stable/12. Now it's done (r368639). Sorry for the delay. I wasn't sure about mergeinfo because of svn-to-git transition. Jung-uk Kim