From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue May 5 14:12:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A932E7DEF for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49GhVy4ZWyz43LF for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9B1F12E7DEE; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE442E7DED for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GhVy3gT9z43LC for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FEB3F258 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 045ECA4Y077856 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 045ECAW8077848 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:12:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236003] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: update to 2020-04-21 snapshot and refactor Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 14:12:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: samy.mahmoudi@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 14:12:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236003 Samy Mahmoudi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samy.mahmoudi@gmail.com --- Comment #52 from Samy Mahmoudi --- Hi, I had set Option "DRI" "3" on two systems (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge) without setting LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE properly. I recently upgraded the Ivy Bridge syst= em, so that the recent changes in graphics/mesa-libs triggered DRI 3 activation. Here's what now happens: After some inactivity, pressing a key powers on the monitor but the screen keeps displaying a previous state which is anterior to the last state I let= the system in before being inactive (on the Ivy Bridge system, that screen is t= he SLiM login manager background picture). Mouse cursor moves are still visibl= e, keyboard presses and mouse events are still received, but nothing renders on screen: I can continue to use the system but can not see what happens. The = only way to resume normal rendering is to move my mouse to a corner which activa= tes the Compiz plugin Expos=C3=A9 or to switch between workspaces with another = Compiz plugin via a key combination.=20 By trial and error on the two systems, I have come to the conclusion that t= his non-critical problem only happens with the combination of intel and DRI 3 a= nd Compiz. By the way, I noticed the Sandy Bridge system shows 8200 FPS in glxgears, whereas the Ivy Bridge system (HD 4000, xorg-server-1.20.8,1 and mesa-dri-18.3.2_10) only shows 7600 FPS. I need to upgrade the Sandy Bridge system to see if it keeps an advantage over the Ivy Bridge system. If it do= es not, that would possibly mean that a performance regression happened somewh= ere. The Sandy Bridge system: ThinkPad T520, HD 3000, 12.0-R with xorg-server-1.18.4_11,1 and mesa-dri-18.3.2_3 The Ivy Bridge system: Optiplex 7010, HD 4000, 12.1-R with xorg-server-1.20.8,1 and mesa-dri-18.3.= 2_10 Keep up the great work Jan! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=