From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 11 14:27:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00797 for stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.frii.com (0@ganymede.frii.com [208.146.240.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00791 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) From: gnat@frii.com Received: from elara.frii.com (elara.frii.com [208.146.240.9]) by ganymede.frii.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA02943 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:27:21 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from gnat@localhost) by elara.frii.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id PAA03394; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:23:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:23:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199708112123.PAA03394@elara.frii.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: pci/if_de.c broken? Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.103) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I just decided to track -stable and am having a problem building today's -stable source to the kernel. My kernel compilation barfs at pci/if_de.c, in all the places where the __FreeBSD__ symbol is compared to 3. I changed the test to >= 2, and now it compiles (still compiling, no news as to whether it works or not). Has -stable become a version of 3.0 without http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook236.html being updated, or is it still meant to be a way for 2.2.2 users to stay ahead of the kernel panics? My apologies if this is caused by my being a bonehead. Nat