From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Sep 1 6:12:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (CDR27-115.accesscable.net [24.138.27.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3B837B42C for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA66697 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 10:12:37 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 10:12:37 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: NF7100R - Quad-Xeon machine ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone have any experience with this? The server that we are picking this up to upgrade is currently running FreeBSD, and it was pretty much my first FreeBSD "slipped through the cracks" ... I'd prefer *not* to have to go to Solaris/x86 to support it, so ... The machine is spec'd out as: NF7100R/Xeon 700/1024KB/256MB/10 HS HDD/6HS PCI + Nefinity 700Mhz/1MB Upgrade II With Pentium III Xeon Processor + ServeRAID-4M Ultra 160 SCSI Controller I know there is a major cleanup/rewrite of the SMP code going on, and very much look forward to seeing that when it comes out ... I just want to be reasonably comfortable that FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE is going to be STABLE on that hardware ... Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message