From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 27 19:59:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE24106566C;
	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sbruno@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE078FC0A;
	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RJx1eQ088342;
	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:01 GMT
	(envelope-from sbruno@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from sbruno@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8RJx0SF088338;
	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:00 GMT (envelope-from sbruno)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:00 GMT
Message-Id: <201209271959.q8RJx0SF088338@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, sbruno@FreeBSD.org
From: sbruno@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/135349: [patch] teach acpidump(8) to disassemble arbitrary
	memory locations
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:01 -0000

Synopsis: [patch] teach acpidump(8) to disassemble arbitrary memory locations

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-acpi->sbruno
Responsible-Changed-By: sbruno
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Sep 27 19:57:24 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Can you update this patch set against -current and add in mem range checks
and header validation?  The current state of this patch could cause bad things
to happen without them if the ACPI DSDT is not correct.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135349