Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:39:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Darrel <levitch@iglou.com>
To:        Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   [solved] manual page | zpool-features < discontinue PF
Message-ID:  <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209221734520.1799@shell1>
In-Reply-To: <505DB5CC.4010707@a1poweruser.com>
References:  <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209181050190.28869@shell1> <20120918205617.02ee281e@fabiankeil.de> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209181532050.29285@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209191233450.3885@shell1> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209212201450.11271@shell1> <505DB5CC.4010707@a1poweruser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> snip
>> 
>> Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD 
>> Packet Firewall that survives upgrades.  Perhaps I should just take all of 
>> the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.
>> 
>> 
>> Darrel
>> 
>> 
>
> On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall
>
> OpenBSD 4.5 version of PF firewall which is included with the base FreeBSD 
> 8.x and 9.x releases is no longer supported by OpenBSD and very back level.
>
> The most current version of OpenBSD is 5.1. PF version 5.0 changed the syntax 
> of the NAT statement making PF no longer backwards compatible which breaks 
> some Freebsd standard, so updated versions of OpenBSD PF will no longer be 
> mass ported to FreeBSD. Any bug fix code to OpenBSD PF will have to be 
> incorporated by hand into FreeBSD's version of PF from this point on.
>
> The following will shine some more light on the subject.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167057
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-September/006740.html
>
>

Second reply.

I intended to change the subject line to solved.

Just for informational purposes, you might not want to do any firewall 
comparison on the OpenBSD misc list.  A Packet Firewall developer 
responded to me personally, writing that the signal-to-noise ratio was too 
high and to refrain from posting to the list.

So much for solving problems and sharing ideas.

Darrel



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.00.1209221734520.1799>