From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jun 24 10:59:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1753D156CB for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:59:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.196.24]) by smtp02.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAA39A2; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:59:20 +0200 Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.ninth-circle.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA02133; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:53:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:53:32 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Leif Neland Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Message-ID: <19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <00c901bebe64$f5267d60$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i In-Reply-To: <00c901bebe64$f5267d60$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>; from Leif Neland on Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:13:32PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Leif Neland (leifn@neland.dk) [990624 19:17]: > > Why not use uucp? Is it just considered old-fashioned, nobody understands > how to set it up, or are there heavy reasons not to use uucp? It seems nowadays nobody knows how to set it up anymore. In fact how many people even remember QWK and Blue Wave? Afaik there are no reasons not to use UUCP... I would gladly learn why people would not advise it. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai(at)wxs.nl The *BSD Programmer's Documentation Project Network/Security Specialist *BSD: We are back and will not accept no... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message