From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 08:23:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6DA106566C; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911628FC0A; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1768009bkc.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gx038wKK3q1Yj8saUwhYiu73ZXBrv1IuWUJXau6ZHFs=; b=ns4y+JJKDqtTEthJukRksJSHlOOk54ktDVNneco+X+AsrC8FDef203eoTo4a2kUfZb z6AbZAYTuLBFkAVgqtxDWSw4mLreH3dO1B+hDqT4AQ2ydvU38+pAm9zq/21kPUXTGj6f 0UPtqUly1rcs0MeMCu9/FousSm/jeKHWheVIuoVEbNhsKnZ5OqY69CETfXpg0ceEefXp o/bpvVJyUGsuzLJO+wuG8eqfgZmmvkPHDgYv4qDJyFxwm7rB2qbA1G4pwy5uhGn7t7D8 XDLvKONhA53AoDFLjhmGpfOWaaggVzET0FYOV4yQebjvdXg9dFJfi7R4QTrqs5hG24f3 rB6g== Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr456309bks.74.1334219031526; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F868F07.8010501@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> <4F868F07.8010501@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:21 +0000 Message-ID: To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:58 -0000 On 12 April 2012 08:15, Alex Dupre wrote: > Chris Rees ha scritto: >>> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for >>> now. >> >> The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. > > Eh?! I never said it. It' fine to keep a maintained (not by me) php52, > since php5 will be updated to 5.4 branch. Oops, that's what you said, sorry. I had hastily jumped to the conclusion that no-one else would be crazy enough to want to maintain it either, but we could be surprised ;) Chris