From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jan  5 19:57:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA05156
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 19:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA05149
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 19:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA12368; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 19:56:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
cc: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: demangling cplusplus names in ld output 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Jan 1997 20:42:13 EST."
             <Pine.OSF.3.95.970105204116.9375B-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu> 
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 19:56:47 -0800
Message-ID: <12364.852523007@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Peter Wemm set up c++filt on it's own, it's already part of current.

I think he knows that, Chuck. :-)

If you'll just read his message again, you'll see that he lists forking
and piping to c++filt as an option for solving the problem of ld symbol
demangling (which I think you may have missed as the objective here).
In otherwords, instead of this:

jkh@time-> cc fump.cc -o fump
/var/tmp/cc0123471.o: Undefined symbol `___8iostreami' referenced from text segment

You'd get this:

jkh@time-> cc fump.cc -o fump
/var/tmp/cc0123471.o: Undefined symbol `iostream::iostream(int)' referenced from text segment

See? :-)

					Jordan