From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Nov 21 22:10:11 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D464011482BD for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D86F79A9A for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3043B11482BC; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED2E11482BA for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B24A779A95 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A2E317E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wALMA8s1067579 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wALMA8pf067578 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233341] 12.0-RC1 i386 vnet does not behave like the amd64 vnet version. Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: qjail1@a1poweruser.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6D86F79A9A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.14 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.12)[-0.124,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.40)[0.404,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.14)[-0.138,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:10:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233341 --- Comment #7 from Joe Barbish --- I got the tcpdump on xl0 and the vnet pflog and the host pflog. I was surpr= ised at the results. None of those flood packets show up. So I had to think about what was different this time. My production config is the gateway host is 11.2 amd64 and the LAN developm= ent host where previous vnet jail testing was done was i386 11.0-RC1.=20 To prepare for 12.0 testing I installed 12.0-RC1 on a empty HD which I swap= ped with the 11.2 hd on the gateway host. I also installed 12.0-RC1 on the LAN development i386 host.=20=20 The previous posted test pflogs are from a config where the gateway host is 12.0-RC1 and the LAN development host is 12.0-RC1. This is the config where= the pflogs on the development LAN host are flooded with all those packets This test I did not swap the gateway host 11.2 HD with the 12.0-RC1 HD, and kept the development LAN host at 12.0-RC1. This resulted in the pflogs on t= he development host to no longer have the flood packets. I attached the tcpdump, host pflog, and vnet jail pflog as separate files --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=