From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 01:07:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913C16A423; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224643D46; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2H17sWC092221; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:07:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:07:54 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Garance A Drosehn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060317030230.G64324@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060316145826.M96629@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: src/etc/periodic/security/800.loginfail X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:07:57 -0000 Hello! On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > But that's the problem, once you start down the road of > matching "everything which might be useful", you open up > a lot of questions as to which messages *are* interesting, > and how they should be displayed in the security-email > message. After all, *everything* in the authlog file is > expected to be interesting in one way or another. Do we > want to copy the entire file into the security email? I > doubt it... I understand current intent as "to report login failures", and I think that refused by the sshd connection attempts could be treated as such. OTOH, SSH.COM's sshd2 isn't the part of the base OS, that's why I'm not sure whether such an addition is "politically correct" (I'm sure it's useful though). Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE