From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Oct 8 14:18:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7408014F3F for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 14:18:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E87181C29; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:21:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E7D3817; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:21:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:21:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: FreeBSD Documentation Project Subject: Re: Style Challenge! In-Reply-To: <19991008133430.368B81D72@bone.nectar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > Grouchy much, Bill? :-) Too often. > Here is the new paragraph, with updated information. The sentences > are brand new. It would have been stupid to make two commits -- one > to replace the paragraph, and one to s/.[ ]/.[ ][ ]/ the paragraph. > Don't you agree? Yes. This would be smart. I just don't see how many of our documents are getting complete re-writes in the near future. > I don't think this is unreasonable. And I'm not saying ``mix formatting > commits with content commits''. Which is what I thought you were. > Relax. ;-) I'll give you the e-mail address of my boss, you can tell him "stop making Bill work insane hours". :> -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message