From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 2 21:01:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA08410 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:01:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA08405; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:01:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id XAA25945; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:00:16 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199612030500.XAA25945@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: TCP/IP bandwidth bragging To: davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:00:16 -0600 (CST) Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, dyson@FreeBSD.org, dennis@etinc.com, kpneal@pobox.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org, torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi, lm@engr.sgi.com, iain@sbs.de, sparclinux@vger.rutgers.edu Reply-To: nobody@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199612030434.XAA18481@jenolan.caipgeneral> from "David S. Miller" at Dec 2, 96 11:34:17 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Now here is an intelligent posting. Now here is someone who couldn't recognize bleeding sarcasm if it came up and bit him on the butt (which it clearly did, judging from the reaction). For future reference: that was "sarcasm". Since it is a little difficult to hold a rational discussion with someone who appears to be trying very hard to be an irritant, and has already made his "opinions" known, I doubt that there is any value in continuing this thread. ... JG