From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 17:41:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CBD16A4C1 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lon1-mail-2.visp.demon.net (lon1-mail-2.visp.demon.net [193.195.70.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A1343FD7 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:41:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lewiz@blue.lewiz.org) Received: from mail.lewiz.org (host-70a-en-u-204.dial.beeb.net [62.56.2.204] (may be forged))3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id ALZ23769; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 01:41:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from blue.lewiz.org ([192.168.0.11]) by mail.lewiz.org with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 19wWZN-0007bA-HX; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 01:41:21 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 1089 invoked by uid 4001); Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:41:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 01:41:21 +0100 From: Lewis Thompson To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20030909004121.GA782@lewiz.org> References: <20030908151226.98548.qmail@web40701.mail.yahoo.com> <3F5D0BA5.8040003@ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F5D0BA5.8040003@ciam.ru> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 90A4 939E 3847 A3E4 8103 2A48 22DA B428 542F ED3F X-GPG-Info: http://www.westwood.karoo.net/pgpkey / horowitz.surfnet.nl User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: cykyc@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_krb5 port question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:41:50 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Jon Passki wrote: > >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT Kerberos > >and not Heimdal? >=20 > KRB5_IMPL=3Dheimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you fix this= =20 > and send a patch to the port maintainer. I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled... I just wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the Heimdal Kerberos provided in the base system. -lewiz. --=20 I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -| msn:purple@lewiz.net | jab:lewiz@jabber.org | url:http://lewiz.net |- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/XSGxItq0KFQv7T8RAuJ+AKDC7zPJ4maaPO+jwIc811f2EZ9s0gCfZICk KLxNLQGC0HCZtiThnjVSca4= =ITdj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--