Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:08:27 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> To: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> Cc: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>, freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) Message-ID: <20050531140827.GF16010@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> References: <BAY21-F14C8EE506B422EAB90338DAE040@phx.gbl> <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:58:50AM -0600, Brad Davis wrote: > No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers. That's just one of it's uses. Take a look at http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/ and scroll down to the example about load balancing, then see carp(4) and search for arpbalance. You can automate the simpler (?) rdr balancing using a script that checks outage and removes/adds addresses to tables, if you prefer that, see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-pf&m=106883416904625&w=2 for an example. Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050531140827.GF16010>