From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 13 22:25:29 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753E7DE5;
 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mckusick@mckusick.com)
Received: from chez.mckusick.com (chez.mckusick.com
 [IPv6:2001:5a8:4:7e72:4a5b:39ff:fe12:452])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5706311F0;
 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chez.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by chez.mckusick.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6DMPP7p002100;
 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from mckusick@chez.mckusick.com)
Message-Id: <201307132225.r6DMPP7p002100@chez.mckusick.com>
To: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Compatibility options for mount(8) 
In-reply-to: <CAOfDtXM958BXberg=N-Pt4H9Z3AF+A3MV02sMWFkCSTQXqi+nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:25:25 -0700
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:25:29 -0000

> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 23:42:29 +0200
> From: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org>
> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
> Subject: Re: Compatibility options for mount(8)
> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
> 
> 2013/7/11 Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>:
> 
> > I am fine with your proposed addition. I would favor changing the
> > manual page from
> >
> > +For compatibility with some other implementations; this flag is
> >
> > to
> >
> > +For compatibility with some Linux implementations; this flag is
> >
> > as it is (primarily) Linux compatibility and also reflects the comment
> > that you have added in the code.
> 
> Well I'm not sure. There's only one implementation I'm aware of that
> accepts -n, the one in the Linux version of mount (i.e. the mount
> program from util-linux package).
> 
> If we want to be more precise we could investigate, but I think it's
> overkill. It doesn't hurt to be vague on this IMHO.
> 
> If you don't mind, I'd leave this with "some other" as initially
> proposed by Jeremy.
> 
> --
> Robert Millan
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

OK to leave it.

	Kirk McKusick