From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 00:32:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8D16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E20D43D4C for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:32:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 22952 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jun 2004 07:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.8?) (192.168.10.8) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 07:32:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:31:22 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com In-Reply-To: <200406010231.20904.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> References: <200406010231.20904.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Message-Id: <20040601162946.6F80.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.01 cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: DNS usage question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 07:32:47 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 02:31:20 -0500 Jay Moore spake thus: > I'm running sendmail on my 5.2.1 system, and have a number of DNSBLs set up in > my sendmail configuration. I am not currently running BIND (or any other > nameserver), and therefore have configured my system to use one of my ISP's > DNS servers. > > I've noticed that each attempted connection to my mail server now generates a > flurry of DNS requests from my mail server to my ISP's DNS server. > > I'd like to streamline this process, but I don't really want to take on DNS > administration. I've heard about caching DNS servers, and "tiny DNS", and I > wondered if they might suit my needs. > > Comments, or recommendations?? > > Thanks, > Jay Running bind as a caching only nameserver is pretty trivial and fairly fool proof. Lots of good docs on the web and should only take a few minutes to get configured. Have not had any experience with TinyDNS so can't comment on that one. HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney