From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 16:21: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432EE37B401 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9QNKPS01466; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 01:20:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:18:58 PDT." <20011026161858.A21629@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 01:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1464.1004138425@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20011026161858.A21629@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes: >On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:51:01PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> In article <20011026134453.B17758@dragon.nuxi.com> you write: >> >64-bit for FreeBSD or 32-bit for FreeBSD. No 1/2's please. >> >> Are you prepared to do the work to ensure that `long' is the same >> width on all FreeBSD architectures? > >If that is desired, I have patches from BDE to make gcc IP32L64.... I'm actually increasingly seeing the point in this idea... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message