From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 19 20:37:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4192016A418 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+RK=b6010fc6@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2075D13C455 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+RK=b6010fc6@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E887164684 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9891D05A6 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:13:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:13:16 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071219201316.1c305f7a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071219191306.GC36016@atarininja.org> References: <4D1AAAB26DADCFB11343F6B3@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <47693FE9.20701@gahr.ch> <41364CD63DE952CCB8602A44@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20071219191306.GC36016@atarininja.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Optional patching X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:37:00 -0000 On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:13:06 -0500 Wesley Shields wrote: > I don't think it matters really, but is probably a matter of personal > preference. The only problem with using an option that I see is that > if the user has no idea if (s)he is on a 64bit platform and turns the > option off. It's for this reason I'd suggest using the .if ${ARCH} > approach. I would have thought that the ".if ${ARCH}" method was the only sensible way of doing it. Packages are built without any options set.