From owner-cvs-lib Fri May 8 04:09:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA03154 for cvs-lib-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 04:09:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-lib) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA03147; Fri, 8 May 1998 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no (skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no [129.240.65.2]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id NAA15329; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:09:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (dag-erli@localhost) by skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:09:35 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Julian Elischer , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libftpio ftpio.c References: <20258.894622218@time.cdrom.com> Organization: Gutteklubben Terrasse / KRST / PUMS / YASMW X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 08 May 1998 13:09:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Fri, 08 May 1998 03:10:18 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > may turn out that sysinstall is one such consumer for FTP media if the > "transactional fetch" of the fetchFooURL() functions proves to be too > slow when grabbing split distributions. I have the rather sneaking > suspicion that it will be. :) Which brings me to another question - is it really necessary to split up the distribution into 240 kB fragments? 720 kB or 1440 kB fragments I could understand, but 240 kB? And for a network or CD installation, it isn't really necessary to split it up at all, is it? -- Noone else has a .sig like this one.