From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 25 09:05:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23031 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:05:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from webserver.smginc.com (webserver.smginc.com [204.170.176.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA22971 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:05:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from AdamT@smginc.com) Received: from smginc.com ([204.170.177.4]) by webserver.smginc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-13723) with SMTP id AAA249 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:07:29 -0500 Received: by smginc.com with Microsoft Mail id <34F478F8@smginc.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 98 12:03:04 PST From: Adam Turoff To: hackers Subject: RE: Token Ring for FreeBSD yet? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 98 12:05:00 PST Message-ID: <34F478F8@smginc.com> X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dave writes: > Robert Withrow writes: > > marquard@zilker.net said: > > :- I sure wish someone would tell IBM! :-) IBM (and perhaps some > > :- others--I don't quite recall) are now talking about 100 Mb/sec Token > > :- Ring. > > > > While everyone else is *making* Gigabit Ethernets. > > Including IBM. > > I work for IBM, so I can speak to this a little. IBM has all of these > large corporate customers (including IBM itself) that have a big > investment in Token Ring. If they can keep these people happy by > creating 100 Mb/sec. token ring on the same wiring, they'll make some > money. That's what's driving IBM. IBM is of sufficient size that anything you say about it is true. I'll buy that they're selling both 100 Mbit Token Ring and Ethernet. I wouldn't be surprised if they're using 2400 Baud terminal connections, either. > Anyway, if you don't like Token Ring, don't buy it. Good point. Can we continue with our regularly scheduled programming please? :-) -- Adam. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message