From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 20 13:13:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.alpha.net.au (mail2.alpha.net.au [203.41.44.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D111517E for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:13:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dannyh@idx.com.au) Received: from psych ([203.41.44.161]) by mail.alpha.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA13232; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:13:36 +1100 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19991221081353.01075978@idx.com.au> X-Sender: dannyh@idx.com.au X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:14:00 +1100 To: Jeremy Chadwick , Alfred Perlstein From: Danny Subject: Re: LAN Questions. Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In relation to the non freebsd solution. The IT Manager insist that the solution must be "Microsoft". (Note I don't like Microsoft also but I am just doing my job) Then how can I solve the problem using Microsoft solutions? Any books, web sites, advice will be appreicated. Looking forward to your feedback. Danny (dannyh@idx.com.au) At 02:21 13/12/99 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:30:45AM -0800, bright@wintelcom.net wrote: >> > - If I configure Freebsd as a NFS server is it possible I can make Windows >> > 98 a NFS client? >> >> I haven't heard of a free NFS client for windows, you're better off >> going with samba and using the native (and free) windows networking >> share system. > > (NOTE: I've removed all other CCd individuals from this mail, > including freebsd-questions). > > There is (was?) a free Windows 9x NFS client, which may or may > not be supported or even listed as valid software any longer > at http://www.truegrid.com/nfs.html. It seems this link no > longer works, though. > > If you need a copy of this software, I do have it. Ask me for > it and I will give it to you: it IS free, after all. Keep in mind > that it's nothing more than a port of NFS utils & daemons ported > to Win9x. I've yet to see it fail me, aside from tossing up some > pointless warnings now and then. > > I do not recommend using NFS under Windows 9x. I highly recommend > finding a commercial solution and moving to Windows NT if you > wish to do NFS under Windows. Or, from what I've been told, > Windows 2000 should have native NFS support (how good, if at > all, is yet to be determined). > > Free is not always better. And no, I am not a Microsoft advocate; > see below. > >> > - Maybe I better solution that may not involve Freebsd. >> >> That's up to you, but challenging people on the list with a statement >> like that is _not_ the way to get help. > > Give the chap some breathing room. It sounds like he's keeping > an open mind: FreeBSD is not the solution for every problem, > you know. > > Any decent system administrator follows this rule: use the > right tool for the job. > > In this case, FreeBSD may not be the "right tool," and there's > nothing wrong with that. I find the Samba solution nothing more > than a hack on top of a hack, not to mention an administrators > nightmare. > >-- >| Jeremy Chadwick yoshi@parodius.com | >| Parodius Networking yoshi@dreamscape.org | >| UNIX System Administrator http://www.parodius.com/ | >| "Linux is only free if your time has no value." - Jamie Zawinski | > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message