From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 5 12:24: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB456152A0 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:23:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA82649; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:22:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199903052022.MAA82649@rah.star-gate.com> To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Amancio Hasty , Terry Lambert , dyson@iquest.net, dick@tar.com, jplevyak@inktomi.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: lockf and kernel threads In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 1999 12:04:33 PST." <199903052004.MAA52547@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 12:22:14 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Not unless you want to rewrite the kernel. But it's actually more the We shall see if the above statement is true or not . In the mean time, with the intent to anchor the discussion in a positive direction , I ask Terry to produce a draft paper on how to implement ASTs on FreeBSD. Best Regards, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message