From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan  8 15:42:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA09091
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 15:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wong.rogerswave.ca (a17b32.rogerswave.ca [204.92.17.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA09058
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 15:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wong@localhost) by wong.rogerswave.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA00356; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 18:42:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 18:42:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Ken Wong <wong@a17b32.rogerswave.ca>
X-Sender: wong@wong.rogerswave.ca
Reply-To: wong@rogerswave.ca
To: proff@suburbia.net
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mmap() updates...how often?
In-Reply-To: <19970108014639.14401.qmail@suburbia.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970108183819.345A-100000@wong.rogerswave.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 proff@suburbia.net wrote:

> 
> Why not just put them all in the same process group, and send the process
> group a SIGUSR1 when new data is ready in the mmaped region?
> 
Is Signal delivery quaranteed in FreeBSD? I mean if 2 or more signals
are sent to a process at the same time. does it quene up the signals?

Ken