From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 14 00:38:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA00770 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:38:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [207.141.254.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA00762 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:38:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@shell.futuresouth.com) Received: (from tim@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA10038; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 02:38:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19971014023832.48036@futuresouth.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 02:38:32 -0500 From: Tim Tsai To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Virtual machine environment? References: <344253EF.345BF651@mad.scientist.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.76 In-Reply-To: ; from spork on Tue, Oct 14, 1997 at 06:49:50AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Just curious, but has anybody ever taken the concept of "chroot" but extended it to all areas of the system? For example, a virtual host would have it's own file system area, processes, IP addresses, etc. Tim