Date: 13 Jun 1999 13:22:30 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: select(2) breakage Message-ID: <xzpu2scxs3t.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Brian Feldman's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 1999 00:44:50 -0400 (EDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906130033380.17648-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> writes: > Another problem that came up with this: I originally started at port 1024. > I monopolized 30000 ports (almost all consecutive, of course). When I try to > connect() a TCP socket as non-root, it fails with EAGAIN (I only tracked it > far enough down as in_pcbbind().) It seems that eventually it gives up trying > to find a port... :-/ What kind of connects are you doing? If you try to connect all your sockets to the same destination,port tuple you'll quickly run out of source ports, since there are only a little less than 4,000 ports available: des@des ~% sysctl -A | grep portrange net.inet.ip.portrange.lowfirst: 1023 net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast: 600 net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 1024 net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 5000 net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152 net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535 connect() normally uses the 1024-5000 range. Try the following: # sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.last=40000 and see if it solves the EAGAIN problem. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu2scxs3t.fsf>