From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 5 10:37:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA17178 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 10:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA17017; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 10:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vsCDt-0001VI-00; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 11:37:33 -0700 To: obrien@NUXI.com (David O'Brien) Subject: Re: conditionally including Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list), hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:33:43 PST." <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com> <19970202135048.PN07710@dragon.nuxi.com> <199701280143.RAA06503@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 11:37:32 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <19970205003343.YB13323@dragon.nuxi.com> David O'Brien writes: : Then what would you suggest? Are they really more different than all the : various sysVr4 that define __svr4__? How close is Solaris, UnixWare, and : Irix? BTW, Solaris 2.5.1 with Sun Soft's 4.0 compiler doesn't define __svr4__. It defines __SVR4. Warner