From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 27 20:42:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA12154 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:42:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA12149 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ki.net (root@[142.77.249.8]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id UAA21650 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 20:41:40 -0800 Received: (from scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA20962; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:40:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:40:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Pentium gcc (pgcc) in ports... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hiya... I'm just grabbing down pl6 of pgcc, and was wondering what the general concensous(sp?) is on it. I know that it is generally accepted that 2.7.2 is too buggy to be used for stuff like compiling XFree and the kernel and whatnot...does anyone have any similar or opposite comments about pgcc? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, Administrator | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc