From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 14:20:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B140E106567D; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1431E8FC21; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C018D46B2D; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25B39B940; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: "Chris Demers" Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:06:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20120229084249.M5878@govital.net> In-Reply-To: <20120229084249.M5878@govital.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202290906.08723.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:20:07 -0500 (EST) Cc: Harry Newton , Adrian Chadd , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore Subject: Re: Regression between 9-RELEASE and 9-STABLE [PCIB ?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:20:10 -0000 On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:54:02 am Chris Demers wrote: > Greetings Everyone, > > Along this same topic, I have also had a problem with 9-STABLE being unstable. > I have been experiencing random kernel core dumps on a machine. I know the > machine is fine, if i switch back to a set of disks running my previous > 8-stable everything is fine. But with a current 9-STABLE as of last night > even I get kernel panics. Can provide more details tomorrow, machine is > currently panicked in the data center and need to go there in the morning to > reboot. Hoping it gets fixed soon, want to start bringing the machine into > production slowly, don't want to have to roll back to 9-release would rather > see this fixed. But i believe it is a variation of the exact same problem > that has been brought up here. Last panic it created a core file, hopefully > it did again so i can debug it. The problem discussed below can only result in boot-time hangs, not in crashes at runtime, so it is completely different. That said, if you are seeing crashes and have core dumps, we would certainly like to see some details such as a backtrace from the dump. -- John Baldwin