Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:16:06 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>, Florian Smeets <flo@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy Message-ID: <d9c064ae-9106-55b9-1fa9-9b7ca82db6de@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <2cfb2038d956813eefb068a8f61e1970@mail.infomaniak.com> References: <7a7501f71442d27f6d8c1c0a16f247c1@mail.infomaniak.com> <EF5FD6F9-D6EA-45F6-8845-B0476D401EBB@freebsd.org> <7fd610fa25ffb9a4348aaadf7459a689@mail.infomaniak.com> <20240315072753.46ffa39e1bbb2e0996099cdf@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <2cfb2038d956813eefb068a8f61e1970@mail.infomaniak.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
15.03.2024 5:59, Daniel Engberg wrote: > That may very well be an option possibly with some guidelines to prevent it turning into a loophole for being a dumping ground. > Since we've moved to git perhaps another option might be to create a separate repo (possibly via submodules) > with less restricive polices Please stop making up polices. Provide tools instead. Eugene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9c064ae-9106-55b9-1fa9-9b7ca82db6de>