From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 23 14:56:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82560E22 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35992164F for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0NEu1kt077352; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0NEu1cp077349; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:01 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Jakub Lach Subject: Re: Lessons learned from source upgrade from FreeBSD i386 9.2 Stable to FreeBSD i386 10.0 Release. In-Reply-To: <1390486224478-5879039.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: References: <52E09F68.8020804@UToledo.edu> <1390486224478-5879039.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:02 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:56:03 -0000 On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Jakub Lach wrote: > I plan to stay some time on 9.2-STABLE (already pkgng and clangfied) waiting > maybe till next release from 10-STABLE tree, however 10-STABLE will be where > I will be eventually heading, so notes in this spirit are valuable reminders > at least, I appreciate it. My experiences converting a couple of systems from 9-STABLE to 10-STABLE over the last couple of months were really pretty easy. These were source updates for both base and ports. Despite changing from pkg_* to pkg and KMS X drivers at the same time, it was surprisingly smooth. If you have devel/ccache installed, remove it before starting, though, it has problems with clang. Using -DNOCLEAN with an existing /usr/obj can go even faster than ccache: less than two minutes for a buildworld on my frequently updated i5/SSD system, sometimes less than one minute.