Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 21:30:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 239630] x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() : [Attachment 206257] v1 (has commit message) Message-ID: <bug-239630-7141-nTEodVK7nd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239630-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-x11 mailing list <x11@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-approval: Bug 239630: x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239630 Attachment 206257: v1 (has commit message) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=206257&action=edit --- Description --- SHM_ANON is faster and more similar to memfd_create(). Not bothering to upstream because futex/mksotemp fixes didn't get any feedback after 2 years. Patchwork is complete crap for one-off contributors i.e., those humble enough to not annoy everyone on patch maillist why their contribution wasn't reviewed yet. libxshmfence is only used by DRI3, so make sure to define LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE via environ(7) due to drm-legacy-kmod hacks in mesa-dri and if using xf86-video-intel add Option "DRI" "3" to xorg.conf.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239630-7141-nTEodVK7nd>