Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 1999 16:42:51 -0400
From:      "James Gill" <gill@topsecret.net>
To:        <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: tomorrow a gateway...
Message-ID:  <NDBBJDFMIMOCFNNCEKADIEMJCJAA.gill@topsecret.net>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJDFMIMOCFNNCEKADOELECJAA.gill@topsecret.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I have added a diagram with a little more info at
http://www.topsecret.net/net

Communicating the problem is half of my communications problem!


->
->  Hello :)
->
->  I am new to FreeBSD and I'm working a FBSD 486 into my home
->  network to act
->  as a router and firewall, NAT, etc.  but It's not quite ready
->  yet.  In the
->  interim, I have both NICs in the machine and up on the same subnet and I
->  keep getting these messages on the console:
->
->  	Jul 19 10:45:75 hostname /kernel: arp: 10.10.10.33 is on
->  ed1 but got reply
->  from
->  	00:a0:24:23:78:e0 on ed0
->
->  It should be noted that the MAC address shown does correspond to the IP
->  address, so that's all working fine.  I think I understand the
->  message; one
->  NIC is ARPing for an IP and the other NIC is picking up the
->  response thus
->  confusing the host.  It seems that this won't be a problem when
->  I move to
->  separate subnets, but having never set up a gateway before I
->  don't think I'm
->  ready to plop this machine in between my live network and the
->  outside world.
->
->  I think my question can be distilled down to:  What do I have
->  to know extra
->  when putting two NICs of the same subnet in one host?
->
->  Some more info:
->
->  the network is connected up stream by an ISDN router that will be set to
->  pass incoming packets to a single host, this will be the router box I'm
->  working on.
->
->  I am using an internal 10.*.*.* network, but only one class-C
->  subnet of it.
->  10.10.10.* with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.192 dividing my
->  network into
->  four subnets.  Here's what I got out of rfc1878 that I based
->  all this on:
->
->  	   Table 1-2 represents traditional subnetting of a Class C network
->  	   address (which is identical to extended Class B subnets).
->
->  	Subnet Mask     # of nets    Net. Addr.  Host Addr Range
->  Brodcast Addr.
->  	Bits of Subnet  hosts/subnet
->
->  	255.255.255.192 4 nets       N.N.N.0     N.N.N.1-62       N.N.N.63
->  	2 bit Class C   62           N.N.N.64    N.N.N.65-126     N.N.N.127
->  	10 bit Class B               N.N.N.128   N.N.N.129-190    N.N.N.191
->  	                             N.N.N.192   N.N.N.193-254    N.N.N.255
->
->  Currently, everything is in the first subnet, and when the gateway is
->  activated, the internal stuff will be moved into the third
->  subnet (by simply
->  adding 100 to the host address).  ...so currently the gateway
->  has .2 and .29
->  and internal addresses are .30 - .33 but the gateway's internal
->  interface
->  will be .129 and internal will be .130 - .133 .
->
->  Thanks in advance for any help...
->
->  =====================================
->  James Gill * http://www.topsecret.net
->  =====================================




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NDBBJDFMIMOCFNNCEKADIEMJCJAA.gill>