From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 10 12:55:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F4E106564A; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2534D8FC08; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-167-236.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.167.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A80C8A1F50; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C10E0B9.1090809@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:55:21 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org References: <20100610072529.75B611CC19@mail.droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20100610072529.75B611CC19@mail.droso.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:55:23 -0000 On 10/06/2010 09:25, linimon@FreeBSD.org wrote: > portname: x11-drivers/input-wacom > broken because: build failed > build errors: none. > overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-drivers&portname=input-wacom See ports/146495 Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?