From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 21:53:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7F5359; Mon, 12 May 2014 21:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9494255D; Mon, 12 May 2014 21:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.1] (dhcp-108-170-169-12.cable.user.start.ca [108.170.169.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by apnoea.adamw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 360E4120076; Mon, 12 May 2014 17:53:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adam Weinberger" To: "Hajimu UMEMOTO" Subject: Re: svn commit: r353496 - in head/security/cyrus-sasl2: . files Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:53:21 -0400 Message-ID: <9EACDCE2-BE95-4F3B-A7EF-AEB9B6484690@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201405091847.s49IlPaG012283@svn.freebsd.org> <20140510121003.3681e34c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.8r4214) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:53:25 -0000 On 10 May 2014, at 14:54, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 10 May 2014 12:10:03 +0200 >>>>>> Tijl Coosemans said: > >> Why, did you commit it to my port without knowing me about it? > > tijl> I got a report from two users close in time so I sensed there > was some > tijl> urgency to commit a fix. One was a private email, the other one > was on > tijl> ports@: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-May/092146.html > >> I want to know why .la is needed? > > tijl> They are needed as long as there are .la files in other ports > which > tijl> still contain references to them. Those ports first need > USES=libtool > tijl> too such that those references are removed. Examples in this > case are > tijl> openldap-client-sasl and libetpan. > > Thank you for explanation. > However, it seems there was non-urgent change as well. Approval has been granted across the ports tree to adopt the modern and simplified build mechanisms. The general idea is that if you haven't done it by now, you were hoping someone would give you a hand with it, which is exactly what was done here. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org