From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jun 28 21:46: 2 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5785F37C25C
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA83408;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:45:56 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA61759; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:45:52 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200006290445.WAA61759@harmony.village.org>
To: "kmays" <kmays@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Use 4.0-STABLE or 5.0-CURRENT? 
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:14:35 EDT."
		<00ad01bfe180$8ca74860$b8f11e3f@KenMays> 
References: <00ad01bfe180$8ca74860$b8f11e3f@KenMays>  <20000628125500.A49568@phy.hr> 
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:45:52 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <00ad01bfe180$8ca74860$b8f11e3f@KenMays> "kmays" writes:
: Question #1: Should be use v4.0-STABLE for production and
: 5.0-20000625-CURRENT for new development/testing??

Yes.  -current is about to get ugly soon.  June 25 is as good/bad as
anything.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message