From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 13 08:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D27A16A407; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE43B43D75; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3D8w2i6095018; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:58:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:58:02 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: <200604130650.k3D6olUu032562@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060413115453.I70728@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <200604130650.k3D6olUu032562@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc network.subr src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:58:19 -0000 Hello! On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Brooks Davis wrote: > Modified files: > etc network.subr > etc/defaults rc.conf > share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 > Log: > Commit the various network interface configutation updates I've been > working on. > 1) Make it possible to configure interfaces with certain characters in > their names that aren't valid in shell variables. Currently supported > characters are ".-/+". They are converted into '_' characters. I wonder whether this part correct: _punct=". - / +" for _punct_c in $punct; do Shouldn't it be for _punct_c in $_punct; do -------------------------^ instead? Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE