From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 9 21:13:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D679AF; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F6BE64; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44BC7200AA; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 22:13:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50EDDD80.9040004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:13:36 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fixes for apr-util's FreeTDS driver References: <50E4A29D.4020204@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <50E4A29D.4020204@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mikhail T." X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:13:40 -0000 On 2013-01-02 22:11, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hello! > > I've made the FreeTDS-driver work again -- and submitted the patch to Apache: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53666 > > The developers are a little slow to pick it up -- perhaps, because few people use Sybase (or MS SQL) with Apache -- but it is quite usable. Can I add the patch to our devel/apr1 port? Thanks! Yours, > > -mi > Hi Mikhail, could you please test the following diff which integrates your freetds patch. http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apr1_with_freetds.diff Build on 8.3 (i386/amd64) and 9.1 (amd64) was OK, but I have no database to test. -- Regards, olli