From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 11 12:36:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA6E16A4DA for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:36:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE3343D45 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost.isc.org [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21D5E6022 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6BCZOUQ041636; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:35:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200607111235.k6BCZOUQ041636@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: "Vlad GALU" From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:03:17 +0300." <79722fad0607101103nd5955e7wc61b5288d79941db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:35:24 +1000 Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:36:29 -0000 > On 7/10/06, Max Laier wrote: > > On Monday 10 July 2006 16:40, Vlad GALU wrote: > > > Is the iwi driver going to be synced with rev. 1.3x of HEAD? I'm > > > using 1.36 along with a RELENG_6 tree, since it works better (read: it > > > works). From the HEAD commit messages I understand that some MFCs > > > would've been in order by now. Are there any show-stoppers that push > > > that schedule ahead ? > > > > no. The only thing that bugs me a bit, is that the change will break POLA > for > > people using the old version. I have yet to hear from somebody using that > > successfully, though. > > > > I will get on MFCing it later today. > > > > Thanks, Max! Which of the iwi ports should be used now on RELENG6 now that this has been MFC'd. net/iwi-firmware-kmod or net/iwi-firmware? > > -- > > /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet > > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News > > > > > > > > > -- > If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. > If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. > If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. > If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org