From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jul 21 9: 5:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A74B37BD81 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13FehW-000L2c-00 for doc@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:26:58 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13FehV-0002lC-00 for doc@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:26:57 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:26:57 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: man.cgi links in FAQ Message-ID: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I see that the FAQ is the only document under doc/ which includes links to man.cgi. Does anyone have a good reason why these can't be taken out and shot^W replaced with the &man.foo.1; entities, or whatever is appropriate? (Sometimes , there are a few links to man.cgi?phones(5) and so on.) Ditto for ports.cgi links? I guess would be a suitable replacement for a lot of those. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D FreeBSD Documentation Project / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message