From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 27 18:26:09 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD8616A477
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ml@sd2i.com)
Received: from www2.sd2i.net (www2.sd2i.net [81.80.186.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD8843D6A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:26:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ml@sd2i.com)
Received: from [192.168.1.127] (ADijon-257-1-97-54.w86-218.abo.wanadoo.fr
	[86.218.160.54]) by www2.sd2i.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10833FABE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:26:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <44510CBE.6050102@sd2i.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:26:06 +0200
From: "ml@sd2i.com" <ml@sd2i.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:26:10 -0000

Kris Kennaway a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
> 
> 
>> options 	QUOTA
> 
> This definitely effects performance on 6.x since it makes your
> filesystem giant-locked, which may also interfere with your network
> processing.

Why would QUOTA affect performance more on 6.x than 4.x ? I would like 
to understand because i think a system cannot be secure without QUOTA

R.