Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:13:37 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reason for 11 or 1.1 appended to SDL files? Message-ID: <20060706191337.a28b719c.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <20060706160358.GA20503@hades.panopticon> References: <20060706160358.GA20503@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > I wonder what is the reason SDL has it's version appended everywhere > (include/SDL11 instead of include/SDL, libSDL-1.1.so instead of > libSDL.so, sdl11-config instead of sdl-config). It takes extra time when > porting SDL software, extra patches need to be added. Is there any good > reason for such changes to sdl' file names? Once we had SDL 1.0 in the tree too and this was done to avoid conflicts between both versions. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060706191337.a28b719c.lehmann>